×

Omphacite
Omphacite

Williamsite
Williamsite



ADD
Compare
X
Omphacite
X
Williamsite

Omphacite Vs Williamsite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa
Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Green
Green
1.3 Streak
Greenish, White
Not Available
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.16-3.432.51-2.63
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Brittle, Conchoidal
Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
2.6 Cleavage
{110} Good, {110} Good
Not Available
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5-64
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
(Ca,Na)(Mg,Fe,Al)Si 2O 6Anthony et al , Handbook of Mineralogy (2001)
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 3Si 2O 5(OH) 4Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Waxy, Silky, Resinous, Greasy
3.2 Pleochroism
Weak: colorless -- very pale green -- very pale green
Not Available
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
TranslucentAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli, Blue Chart Gem Identification (2010)
3.5 Refractive Index
1.662-1.7231.530-1.575
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Not Available
Not Available
3.8 Birefringence
Not AvailableNot Available
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TranslucentAnthony et al
TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Omphacite Vs Williamsite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Omphacite and Williamsite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Omphacite Vs Williamsite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Omphacite is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Uneven and Uneven. Williamsite fracture is Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Handbook of mineralogy (2001).

Omphacite Vs Williamsite Luster

A primary knowledge about Omphacite vs Williamsite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Omphacite exhibits Vitreous luster. Williamsite, on other hand, exhibits Greasy, Resinous, Silky and Waxy luster.