Orthoclase

Anthophyllite

Orthoclase Vs Anthophyllite

Orthoclase

Anthophyllite

Add ⊕

1 Astrology

1.1 Origin

Russia

Not Available, Southern and central Africa

1.2 Color

Colorless, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow, White, pink

Brown, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish

1.3 Streak

White

gray

1.4 For which Rashi?

Not Available

1.5 Planet

Not Available

1.6 Element of Planets

Not Available

1.7 How to Wear?

1.7.1 Finger

Not Available

1.7.2 Ring Metal

Not Available

1.8 Energy

Not Available

1.9 Deities

Not Available

1.10 Not to wear with

Not Available

1.11 Powers

Not Available

1.12 Birthstone

1.12.1 Planetary

Not Available

1.12.2 Talisman

Not Available

2 Physical Properties

2.1 Tenacity

Not Available

2.2 Solubility

Not Available

2.3 Durability

Not Available

2.4 Specific Gravity

2.54-2.612.9-3.5

1 7.18

2.5 Fracture

Gems, Uneven

Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle

2.6 Cleavage

Has perfect cleavage on {001} and good cleavage on {010}. Cleavages intersect at 90°.

{110} Perfect, {???} Distinct, {???} Distinct

2.7 Mohs Hardness

65.5-6

2 10

2.8 Chemical Composition

KAlSi 3O 8Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references

(Mg,Fe2+ ) 2(Mg,Fe2+ ) 5Si 8O 22(OH) 2Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)

3 Optical Properties

3.1 Luster

Vitreous, Pearly

3.2 Pleochroism

colorless.

When Fe-rich

3.3 Dispersion

0.01NA

0.007 1

3.4 Transparency

Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references

Transparent

3.5 Refractive Index

1.518-1.5361.603-1.690

1 3.25

3.6 Optic Character

Not Available

Biaxial/+

3.7 Crystal System

monoclinic

Orthorhombic Dipyramidal H-M Symbol (2/m 2/m 2/m) Space Group: P nma

3.8 Birefringence

0.0050-0.0060Not Available

0 0.296

3.9 Clarity

TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda

Transparent

4 Benefits

4.1 Physical

4.1.1 Neurological

Not Available

4.1.2 Cardiovascular

Not Available

4.1.3 Respiratory

Not Available

4.1.4 Reproductive

Not Available

4.1.5 Digestive

Not Available

4.2 Psychology

Not Available

4.3 Healing

Not Available

4.4 Qualities Associated

Not Available

Orthoclase Vs Anthophyllite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Orthoclase and Anthophyllite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Orthoclase Vs Anthophyllite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Orthoclase is Gems and Uneven. Anthophyllite fracture is Brittle, Brittle, Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Conchoidal.

Compare Colorless Gems

Orthoclase Vs Phosphophyllite

Orthoclase Vs Phenakite

Orthoclase Vs Phosphosiderite

Orthoclase Vs Anthophyllite Luster

A primary knowledge about Orthoclase vs Anthophyllite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Orthoclase exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster. Anthophyllite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.