×

Orthoclase
Orthoclase

Stibiotantalite
Stibiotantalite



ADD
Compare
X
Orthoclase
X
Stibiotantalite

Orthoclase Vs Stibiotantalite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Russia
Mozambique, Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Colorless, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow, White, pink
Yellow, Reddish, Brown, Greenish
1.3 Streak
White
Yellow
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.54-2.61Not Available
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Gems, Uneven
ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Brittle, Conchoidal
2.6 Cleavage
Has perfect cleavage on {001} and good cleavage on {010}. Cleavages intersect at 90°.
{???} Perfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
65.5-6
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
KAlSi 3O 8Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
SbTaO 4Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Pearly
Adamantine
3.2 Pleochroism
colorless.
Not Available
3.3 Dispersion
0.01NA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
3.5 Refractive Index
1.518-1.5362.37-2.45
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Not Available
3.8 Birefringence
0.0050-0.00600.08
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Orthoclase Vs Stibiotantalite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Orthoclase and Stibiotantalite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Orthoclase Vs Stibiotantalite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Orthoclase is Gems and Uneven. Stibiotantalite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001) and Handbook of mineralogy (2001).

Orthoclase Vs Stibiotantalite Luster

A primary knowledge about Orthoclase vs Stibiotantalite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Orthoclase exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster. Stibiotantalite, on other hand, exhibits Adamantine luster.