×

Orthoclase
Orthoclase

Turquoise
Turquoise



ADD
Compare
X
Orthoclase
X
Turquoise

Orthoclase Vs Turquoise

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Russia
Afghanistan, Australia, India, blue, green, blue, green
1.2 Color
Colorless, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow, White, pink
Green, Blue, gray
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Sagittarius, Pisces, Aquarius, Sagittarius, Pisces, Aquarius, Sagittarius, Pisces, Aquarius
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Venus, Neptune
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Earth
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Receptive
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Buddha
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Protection, Courage, Love
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Soluble
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.54-2.612.30-2.90
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Gems, Uneven
Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
Has perfect cleavage on {001} and good cleavage on {010}. Cleavages intersect at 90°.
Good to perfect_usually N/A
2.7 Mohs Hardness
65-6
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
KAlSi 3O 8Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
CuAl6(PO4)4(OH)8 • 4H2O
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Pearly
Waxy
3.2 Pleochroism
colorless.
Weak
3.3 Dispersion
0.01None
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Translucent, Opaque
3.5 Refractive Index
1.518-1.5361.610-1.650
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Triclinic
3.8 Birefringence
0.0050-0.00600.040
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Translucent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Orthoclase Vs Turquoise Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Orthoclase and Turquoise Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Orthoclase Vs Turquoise fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Orthoclase is Gems and Uneven. Turquoise fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas and Gemstones (2009).

Orthoclase Vs Turquoise Luster

A primary knowledge about Orthoclase vs Turquoise luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Orthoclase exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster. Turquoise, on other hand, exhibits Waxy luster.