×

Phenakite
Phenakite

Cryolite
Cryolite



ADD
Compare
X
Phenakite
X
Cryolite

Phenakite Vs Cryolite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
USA, Brazyl, Switzerland, Tanzania, Madagascar, Russia, Sri Lanka
Not Available
1.2 Color
Colorless, Yellow, pink, Red
Colorless, White, Brownish, Reddish, Black, Brownish, Black, Colorless, gray, White, Reddish, Brown
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Brittle
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Soluble
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.90-2.982.97
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Conchoidal, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Brittle
Uneven
2.6 Cleavage
Distinct on {11 2 0}, imperfect on {10 1 1}
None observed
2.7 Mohs Hardness
7.5-82.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Be 2SiO 4Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
Na 3AlF 6Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous, Greasy, Pearly
3.2 Pleochroism
Distinct: colorless orangy-yellowHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli
colorless.
3.3 Dispersion
0.02NA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
3.5 Refractive Index
1.650-1.6951.338-1.339
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Trigonal
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
0.0160.001
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Phenakite Vs Cryolite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Phenakite and Cryolite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Phenakite Vs Cryolite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Phenakite is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalWalter Schumann and Gemstones of the world (2001). Cryolite fracture is Uneven.

Phenakite Vs Cryolite Luster

A primary knowledge about Phenakite vs Cryolite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Phenakite exhibits Vitreous luster. Cryolite, on other hand, exhibits Greasy, Pearly and Vitreous luster.