×

Pumpellyite
Pumpellyite

Williamsite
Williamsite



ADD
Compare
X
Pumpellyite
X
Williamsite

Pumpellyite Vs Williamsite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa
Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Green
Green
1.3 Streak
Not Available
Not Available
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.20-3.302.51-2.63
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Not Available
Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
2.6 Cleavage
Not Available
Not Available
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5-64
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Ca 2(Mg,Fe,Mn,Al) 2(SiO 4)(Si 2O 7)(OH) 2 · H 2OUlrich Henn and Claudio C.
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 3Si 2O 5(OH) 4Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Fibrous
Waxy, Silky, Resinous, Greasy
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
Not Available
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004)
TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli, Blue Chart Gem Identification (2010)
3.5 Refractive Index
1.674-1.7641.530-1.575
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Not Available
3.8 Birefringence
0.014-0.016Not Available
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
OpaqueUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Pumpellyite Vs Williamsite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Pumpellyite and Williamsite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Pumpellyite Vs Williamsite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Williamsite fracture is Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Handbook of mineralogy (2001).

Pumpellyite Vs Williamsite Luster

A primary knowledge about Pumpellyite vs Williamsite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Pumpellyite exhibits Fibrous luster. Williamsite, on other hand, exhibits Greasy, Resinous, Silky and Waxy luster.