×

Riebeckite
Riebeckite

Smithsonite
Smithsonite



ADD
Compare
X
Riebeckite
X
Smithsonite

Riebeckite Vs Smithsonite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available
USA, Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Black, Blue, Yellow, Green
Brown, Green, White, gray, Blue, Yellow
1.3 Streak
Grey, Greenish, Brown
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Brittle
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.28-3.444.00-4.65
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Splintery, Brittle
Uneven, Sub-Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Metallic
2.6 Cleavage
Perfect on {110}, intersecting at 56° and 124°; partings on {100} and {010}
Perfect on [1011]
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5.0-6.05-5.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Not Available
ZnCO 3Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Silky
Vitreous, Pearly
3.2 Pleochroism
X = blue
AbsentWalter Schumann
3.3 Dispersion
NA0.01
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Not Available
Translucent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.680-1.6981.620-1.850
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Trigonal
3.8 Birefringence
0.005-0.0080.223-0.227
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Not Available
Translucent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Riebeckite Vs Smithsonite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Riebeckite and Smithsonite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Riebeckite Vs Smithsonite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Riebeckite is Brittle, Splintery and Uneven. Smithsonite fracture is Brittle, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Metallic, Sub-Conchoidal, Uneven and UnevenWalter Schumann.

Riebeckite Vs Smithsonite Luster

A primary knowledge about Riebeckite vs Smithsonite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Riebeckite exhibits Silky and Vitreous luster. Smithsonite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.