Scolecite

Anthophyllite

Scolecite Vs Anthophyllite

Scolecite

Anthophyllite

Add ⊕

1 Astrology

1.1 Origin

Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Ethiopia, Italy, Mexico, Mozambique, Southern and central Africa, Switzerland

Not Available, Southern and central Africa

1.2 Color

Colorless, Brownish, White

Brown, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish

1.3 Streak

White

gray

1.4 For which Rashi?

Not Available

1.5 Planet

Not Available

1.6 Element of Planets

Not Available

1.7 How to Wear?

1.7.1 Finger

Not Available

1.7.2 Ring Metal

Not Available

1.8 Energy

Not Available

1.9 Deities

Not Available

1.10 Not to wear with

Not Available

1.11 Powers

Not Available

1.12 Birthstone

1.12.1 Planetary

Not Available

1.12.2 Talisman

Not Available

2 Physical Properties

2.1 Tenacity

Brittle

Not Available

2.2 Solubility

Soluble

Not Available

2.3 Durability

Not Available

2.4 Specific Gravity

2.20-2.232.9-3.5

1 7.18

2.5 Fracture

Irregular/uneven, UnevenAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Brittle, Uneven

Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle

2.6 Cleavage

Perfect on {110} and {1 1 0}

{110} Perfect, {???} Distinct, {???} Distinct

2.7 Mohs Hardness

5-5.55.5-6

2 10

2.8 Chemical Composition

CaAl 2Si 3O 10 · 3H 2OUlrich Henn and Claudio C.

(Mg,Fe2+ ) 2(Mg,Fe2+ ) 5Si 8O 22(OH) 2Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)

3 Optical Properties

3.1 Luster

Vitreous, Silky, Fibrous

Vitreous, Pearly

3.2 Pleochroism

X: colourless Y: colourless Z: colourless

When Fe-rich

3.3 Dispersion

NANA

0.007 1

3.4 Transparency

Transparent, Translucent

Transparent

3.5 Refractive Index

1.512-1.5231.603-1.690

1 3.25

3.6 Optic Character

Not Available

Biaxial/+

3.7 Crystal System

monoclinic

Orthorhombic Dipyramidal H-M Symbol (2/m 2/m 2/m) Space Group: P nma

3.8 Birefringence

0.011Not Available

0 0.296

3.9 Clarity

Transparent

4 Benefits

4.1 Physical

4.1.1 Neurological

Not Available

4.1.2 Cardiovascular

Not Available

4.1.3 Respiratory

Not Available

4.1.4 Reproductive

Not Available

4.1.5 Digestive

Not Available

4.2 Psychology

Not Available

4.3 Healing

Not Available

4.4 Qualities Associated

Not Available

Scolecite Vs Anthophyllite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Scolecite and Anthophyllite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Scolecite Vs Anthophyllite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Scolecite is Brittle, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Irregular/uneven, Uneven and UnevenAnthony et al. Anthophyllite fracture is Brittle, Brittle, Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Conchoidal.

Compare Gems Found In Australia

Scolecite Vs Sugilite

Scolecite Vs Tektite

Scolecite Vs Tantalite

Scolecite Vs Anthophyllite Luster

A primary knowledge about Scolecite vs Anthophyllite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Scolecite exhibits Fibrous, Silky and Vitreous luster. Anthophyllite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.