Home
×

Smithsonite
Smithsonite

Copper
Copper



ADD
Compare
X
Smithsonite
X
Copper

Smithsonite Vs Copper

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
USA, Southern and central Africa
Not Available
1.2 Color
Brown, Green, White, gray, Blue, Yellow
Green, Brown, Red, pink, Red
1.3 Streak
White
rose
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Taurus, Sagittarius, Taurus, Sagittarius, Taurus, Sagittarius
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Venus
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Water
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Receptive
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Protection
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Brittle
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
4.00-4.65
Not Available
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Sub-Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Metallic
Hackly Jagged, torn surfaces, (e.g. fractured metals)., torn surfaces, (e.g. fractured metals).
2.6 Cleavage
Perfect on [1011]
None
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5-5.5
2.5
2.8 Chemical Composition
ZnCO 3Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
Cu
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Pearly
Not Available
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
Not Available
3.3 Dispersion
Albite
0.01
Rank: 26 (Overall)
Not Available
Rank: N/A (Overall)
Fluorite
ADD ⊕
3.4 Transparency
Translucent
Not Available
3.5 Refractive Index
1.620-1.850
Not Available
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Trigonal
Isometric Hexoctahedral H-M Symbol (4/m 3 2/m) Space Group: F m3m
3.8 Birefringence
0.223-0.227
Not Available
3.9 Clarity
Translucent
Not Available
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Smithsonite Vs Copper Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Smithsonite and Copper Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Smithsonite Vs Copper fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Smithsonite is Brittle, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Metallic, Sub-Conchoidal, Uneven and UnevenWalter Schumann. Copper fracture is (e.g. fractured metals)., (e.g. fractured metals)., Hackly Jagged, torn surfaces and torn surfaces.

Smithsonite Vs Copper Luster

A primary knowledge about Smithsonite vs Copper luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Smithsonite exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.