×

Smithsonite
Smithsonite

Cuprite
Cuprite



ADD
Compare
X
Smithsonite
X
Cuprite

Smithsonite Vs Cuprite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
USA, Southern and central Africa
Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Brown, Green, White, gray, Blue, Yellow
Red, Brown, Red, Red, Black
1.3 Streak
White
Brownish, Red, Brownish, Red
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Brittle
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
4.00-4.655.85-6.15
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Sub-Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Metallic
Conchoidal, Metallic, UnevenArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle, Conchoidal
2.6 Cleavage
Perfect on [1011]
Fair in four directions forming octahedrons
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5-5.53.5-4
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
ZnCO 3Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
Cu 2OMichael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Pearly
Adamantine
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
visible
3.3 Dispersion
0.01NA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Translucent
TranslucentWalter Schumann
3.5 Refractive Index
1.620-1.8502.849
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Trigonal
cubic
3.8 Birefringence
0.223-0.227Not Available
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Translucent
TranslucentWalter Schumann
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Smithsonite Vs Cuprite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Smithsonite and Cuprite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Smithsonite Vs Cuprite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Smithsonite is Brittle, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Metallic, Sub-Conchoidal, Uneven and UnevenWalter Schumann. Cuprite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Gemstones (2009), Metallic and UnevenArthur Thomas.

Smithsonite Vs Cuprite Luster

A primary knowledge about Smithsonite vs Cuprite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Smithsonite exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster. Cuprite, on other hand, exhibits Adamantine luster.