×

Smithsonite
Smithsonite

Omphacite
Omphacite



ADD
Compare
X
Smithsonite
X
Omphacite

Smithsonite Vs Omphacite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
USA, Southern and central Africa
Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Brown, Green, White, gray, Blue, Yellow
Green
1.3 Streak
White
Greenish, White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Brittle
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
4.00-4.653.16-3.43
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Sub-Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Metallic
Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Brittle, Conchoidal
2.6 Cleavage
Perfect on [1011]
{110} Good, {110} Good
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5-5.55-6
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
ZnCO 3Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
(Ca,Na)(Mg,Fe,Al)Si 2O 6Anthony et al , Handbook of Mineralogy (2001)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Pearly
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
Weak: colorless -- very pale green -- very pale green
3.3 Dispersion
0.01NA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Translucent
TranslucentAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
3.5 Refractive Index
1.620-1.8501.662-1.723
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Trigonal
Not Available
3.8 Birefringence
0.223-0.227Not Available
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Translucent
TranslucentAnthony et al
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Smithsonite Vs Omphacite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Smithsonite and Omphacite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Smithsonite Vs Omphacite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Smithsonite is Brittle, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Metallic, Sub-Conchoidal, Uneven and UnevenWalter Schumann. Omphacite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Uneven and Uneven.

Smithsonite Vs Omphacite Luster

A primary knowledge about Smithsonite vs Omphacite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Smithsonite exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster. Omphacite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.