×

Smithsonite
Smithsonite

Topaz
Topaz



ADD
Compare
X
Smithsonite
X
Topaz

Smithsonite Vs Topaz

Add ⊕
1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
USA, Southern and central Africa
Brazil, Madagascar, Russia, USA, Mexico, Pakistan, brown, Yellow, Orange, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Russia, brown, Yellow, Orange, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Russia
1.2 Color
Brown, Green, White, gray, Blue, Yellow
Yellow, Blue, Green, Red, White, Colorless, Blue, Red, Green, Yellow, pink, Brown
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Sagittarius
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Sun
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Projective
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Ra
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Healing, Love, Money
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Brittle
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
4.00-4.653.49-3.57
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Sub-Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Metallic
Subconchoidal, Uneven, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
Perfect on [1011]
[001] Perfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5-5.58
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
ZnCO 3Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
Al2SiO4(F,OH)2
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Pearly
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
Weak
3.3 Dispersion
0.010.01
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Translucent
Transparent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.620-1.8501.606-1.644
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Trigonal
Orthorhombic
3.8 Birefringence
0.223-0.2270.008-0.011
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Translucent
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Smithsonite Vs Topaz Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Smithsonite and Topaz Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Smithsonite Vs Topaz fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Smithsonite is Brittle, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Metallic, Sub-Conchoidal, Uneven and UnevenWalter Schumann. Topaz fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Subconchoidal and Uneven.

Smithsonite Vs Topaz Luster

A primary knowledge about Smithsonite vs Topaz luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Smithsonite exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster. Topaz, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.