×

Stibiotantalite
Stibiotantalite

Chrome Diopside
Chrome Diopside



ADD
Compare
X
Stibiotantalite
X
Chrome Diopside

Stibiotantalite Vs Chrome Diopside

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Mozambique, Southern and central Africa
Russia, green, violet, Yellow, blue, green, violet, Yellow, blue
1.2 Color
Yellow, Reddish, Brown, Greenish
Black, Violet, Blue, Green
1.3 Streak
Yellow
Not Available
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Gemini, Virgo, Gemini, Virgo, Gemini, Virgo
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Mercury
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Earth
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Receptive
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Gia
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
Not Available3.22-3.40
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Brittle, Conchoidal
ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009)
2.6 Cleavage
{???} Perfect
1,2 prismatic.
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5.5-65-6
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
SbTaO 4Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
(Ca,Cr)MgSi 2O 6Gemdat.org , Management Team (2012)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Adamantine
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
Common trichroism: light green
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
3.5 Refractive Index
2.37-2.451.668-1.703
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Not Available
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
0.080.024-0.030
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Gems
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Stibiotantalite Vs Chrome Diopside Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Stibiotantalite and Chrome Diopside Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Stibiotantalite Vs Chrome Diopside fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Stibiotantalite is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001) and Handbook of mineralogy (2001). Chrome Diopside fracture is ConchoidalArthur Thomas, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Gemstones (2009).

Stibiotantalite Vs Chrome Diopside Luster

A primary knowledge about Stibiotantalite vs Chrome Diopside luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Stibiotantalite exhibits Adamantine luster. Chrome Diopside, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.