×

Topaz
Topaz

Hambergite
Hambergite



ADD
Compare
X
Topaz
X
Hambergite

Topaz Vs Hambergite

Add ⊕
1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Brazil, Madagascar, Russia, USA, Mexico, Pakistan, brown, Yellow, Orange, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Russia, brown, Yellow, Orange, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Russia
the type locality
1.2 Color
Yellow, Blue, Green, Red, White, Colorless, Blue, Red, Green, Yellow, pink, Brown
Colorless, gray, White
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Sagittarius
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Sun
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Projective
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Ra
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Healing, Love, Money
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.49-3.572.33-2.37
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Subconchoidal, Uneven, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
ConchoidalWalter Schumann, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Metallic
2.6 Cleavage
[001] Perfect
Perfect on {010}, good on {100}
2.7 Mohs Hardness
87.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Al2SiO4(F,OH)2
Be 2BO 3(OH)Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Weak
NilArthur Thomas
3.3 Dispersion
0.010.02
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Transparent
Transparent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.606-1.6441.543-1.631
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Orthorhombic
Orthorhombic
3.8 Birefringence
0.008-0.0110.071-0.074
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Transparent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Topaz Vs Hambergite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Topaz and Hambergite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Topaz Vs Hambergite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Topaz is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Subconchoidal and Uneven. Hambergite fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references and Metallic.

Topaz Vs Hambergite Luster

A primary knowledge about Topaz vs Hambergite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Topaz exhibits Vitreous luster. Hambergite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.