Williamsite

Azurmalachite

Williamsite Vs Azurmalachite

Williamsite

Azurmalachite

Add ⊕

1 Astrology

1.1 Origin

Southern and central Africa

Not Available, Southern and central Africa

1.2 Color

Green

Blue

1.3 Streak

Not Available

1.4 For which Rashi?

Not Available

Capricorn, Scorpio

1.5 Planet

Not Available

Venus

1.6 Element of Planets

Not Available

Earth

1.7 How to Wear?

1.7.1 Finger

Not Available

1.7.2 Ring Metal

Not Available

1.8 Energy

Not Available

Receptive

1.9 Deities

Not Available

Freyja

1.10 Not to wear with

Not Available

1.11 Powers

Not Available

Protection

1.12 Birthstone

1.12.1 Planetary

Not Available

1.12.2 Talisman

Not Available

2 Physical Properties

2.1 Tenacity

Not Available

2.2 Solubility

Not Available

2.3 Durability

Not Available

2.4 Specific Gravity

2.51-2.633.70-3.95

1 7.18

2.5 Fracture

Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)

ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012), ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012)

2.6 Cleavage

Not Available

1,1 basal.

2.7 Mohs Hardness

43.5-4

2 10

2.8 Chemical Composition

(Mg,Fe2+ ) 3Si 2O 5(OH) 4Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)

(Cu) 3(OH) 2(CO 3) 2 + Cu 2(CO 3)(OH) 2Gemdat.org , Management Team (2012)

3 Optical Properties

3.1 Luster

Waxy, Silky, Resinous, Greasy

Vitreous, Silky

3.2 Pleochroism

Not Available

AbsentWalter Schumann

3.3 Dispersion

NANA

0.007 1

3.4 Transparency

TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli, Blue Chart Gem Identification (2010)

Translucent

3.5 Refractive Index

1.530-1.5751.655-1.909

1 3.25

3.6 Optic Character

Not Available

Biaxial/+

3.7 Crystal System

Not Available

monoclinic

3.8 Birefringence

Not Available0.108-0.254

0 0.296

3.9 Clarity

TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli

Translucent

4 Benefits

4.1 Physical

4.1.1 Neurological

Not Available

4.1.2 Cardiovascular

Not Available

4.1.3 Respiratory

Not Available

4.1.4 Reproductive

Not Available

4.1.5 Digestive

Not Available

4.2 Psychology

Not Available

4.3 Healing

Not Available

4.4 Qualities Associated

Not Available

Williamsite Vs Azurmalachite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Williamsite and Azurmalachite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Williamsite Vs Azurmalachite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Williamsite is Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Handbook of mineralogy (2001). Azurmalachite fracture is ConchoidalGemdat.org, ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012) and Management Team (2012).

Compare Green Gemstones

Williamsite Vs Garnet Malaia

Williamsite Vs Fancy Diamond

Williamsite Vs Idocrase

Williamsite Vs Azurmalachite Luster

A primary knowledge about Williamsite vs Azurmalachite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Williamsite exhibits Greasy, Resinous, Silky and Waxy luster. Azurmalachite, on other hand, exhibits Silky and Vitreous luster.