×

Williamsite
Williamsite

Catapleiite
Catapleiite



ADD
Compare
X
Williamsite
X
Catapleiite

Williamsite Vs Catapleiite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Green
Blue, Brown, Colorless, Yellow, Blue, Brown, Colorless, Yellow
1.3 Streak
Not Available
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.51-2.632.72
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
Brittle, Metallic, Brittle, Metallic
2.6 Cleavage
Not Available
{110} Perfect, {010} Perfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
45-6
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 3Si 2O 5(OH) 4Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
Na 2ZrSi 3O 9 · 2H 2OMichael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Waxy, Silky, Resinous, Greasy
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
Not Available
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli, Blue Chart Gem Identification (2010)
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda, Gemmological Tables (2004)
3.5 Refractive Index
1.530-1.5751.590-1.629
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Not Available
Monoclinic Prismatic H-M Symbol (2/m) Space Group: B2/b (pseudo-HEX)
3.8 Birefringence
Not Available0.039
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Williamsite Vs Catapleiite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Williamsite and Catapleiite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Williamsite Vs Catapleiite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Williamsite is Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Handbook of mineralogy (2001). Catapleiite fracture is Brittle, Brittle, Metallic and Metallic.

Williamsite Vs Catapleiite Luster

A primary knowledge about Williamsite vs Catapleiite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Williamsite exhibits Greasy, Resinous, Silky and Waxy luster. Catapleiite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.