×

Williamsite
Williamsite

Omphacite
Omphacite



ADD
Compare
X
Williamsite
X
Omphacite

Williamsite Vs Omphacite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa
Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Green
Green
1.3 Streak
Not Available
Greenish, White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.51-2.633.16-3.43
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Brittle, Conchoidal
2.6 Cleavage
Not Available
{110} Good, {110} Good
2.7 Mohs Hardness
45-6
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 3Si 2O 5(OH) 4Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
(Ca,Na)(Mg,Fe,Al)Si 2O 6Anthony et al , Handbook of Mineralogy (2001)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Waxy, Silky, Resinous, Greasy
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
Weak: colorless -- very pale green -- very pale green
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli, Blue Chart Gem Identification (2010)
TranslucentAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
3.5 Refractive Index
1.530-1.5751.662-1.723
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Not Available
Not Available
3.8 Birefringence
Not AvailableNot Available
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli
TranslucentAnthony et al
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Williamsite Vs Omphacite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Williamsite and Omphacite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Williamsite Vs Omphacite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Williamsite is Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Handbook of mineralogy (2001). Omphacite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Uneven and Uneven.

Williamsite Vs Omphacite Luster

A primary knowledge about Williamsite vs Omphacite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Williamsite exhibits Greasy, Resinous, Silky and Waxy luster. Omphacite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.