×

Actinolite
Actinolite

Amber
Amber



ADD
Compare
X
Actinolite
X
Amber

Actinolite Vs Amber

Add ⊕
1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
India
1.2 Color
Green, Black, White, Grey, Green, Black, White, Grey, Green, Black, gray, Black, Green, Black, gray, Black
White, Red, Green, Blue, Brown, Yellow, Brown, Black, pink, Blue, Green, Yellow, Brown, Yellow, Brown, orange
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Leo
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Sun
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Earth, Air, Water
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Projective
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Freyja
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Healing, Protection, Love
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Soluble
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.001.05-1.10
Achroite
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, UnevenArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Splintery
ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Conchoidal, Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Conchoidal, Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
perfect along {110}.
None
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5-62-2.5
Adamite
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Ca 2(Mg,Fe) 5Si 8O 22(OH) 2Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
[C,H,O]
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Resinous
3.2 Pleochroism
moderate
AbsentWalter Schumann
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda, Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Transparent, Translucent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.613-1.6281.539-1.545
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Amorphous
3.8 Birefringence
0.0250-0.0270Not Available
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Transparent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Actinolite Vs Amber Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Actinolite and Amber Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Actinolite Vs Amber fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Actinolite is Gemstones (2009), Splintery, Uneven and UnevenArthur Thomas. Amber fracture is Brittle, Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Gemstones (2009).

Actinolite Vs Amber Luster

A primary knowledge about Actinolite vs Amber luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Actinolite exhibits Vitreous luster. Amber, on other hand, exhibits Resinous luster.