Home
×

Actinolite
Actinolite

Nepheline
Nepheline



ADD
Compare
X
Actinolite
X
Nepheline

Actinolite Vs Nepheline

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
Canada
1.2 Color
Green, Black, White, Grey, Green, Black, White, Grey, Green, Black, gray, Black, Green, Black, gray, Black
White, Reddish, gray, Brown, Brownish
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.00
2.55-2.65
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, UnevenArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Splintery
Subconchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Conchoidal, Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
perfect along {110}.
[1010] Poor
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5-6
5-6
2.8 Chemical Composition
Ca 2(Mg,Fe) 5Si 8O 22(OH) 2Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
Na 3(Na,K)Al 4Si 4O 16Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous, Greasy
3.2 Pleochroism
moderate
Not Available
3.3 Dispersion
Albite
Not Available
Rank: N/A (Overall)
Not Available
Rank: N/A (Overall)
Fluorite
ADD ⊕
3.4 Transparency
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda, Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Transparent, Translucent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.613-1.628
1.529-1.547
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Hexagonal
3.8 Birefringence
0.0250-0.0270
0.003-0.004
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Transparent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Actinolite Vs Nepheline Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Actinolite and Nepheline Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Actinolite Vs Nepheline fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Actinolite is Gemstones (2009), Splintery, Uneven and UnevenArthur Thomas. Nepheline fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Subconchoidal.

Actinolite Vs Nepheline Luster

A primary knowledge about Actinolite vs Nepheline luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Actinolite exhibits Vitreous luster. Nepheline, on other hand, exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster.

Let Others Know
×