×

Anthophyllite
Anthophyllite

Chrysocolla
Chrysocolla



ADD
Compare
X
Anthophyllite
X
Chrysocolla

Anthophyllite Vs Chrysocolla

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
1.2 Color
Brown, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown
1.3 Streak
gray
White, Blue, Green
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Taurus
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Venus
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Water
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Receptive
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Venus
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Love
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.9-3.52.00-2.45
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
{110} Perfect, {???} Distinct, {???} Distinct
none
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5.5-62-4
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 2(Mg,Fe2+ ) 5Si 8O 22(OH) 2Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Pearly
Vitreous, Greasy
3.2 Pleochroism
When Fe-rich
AbsentWalter Schumann
3.3 Dispersion
NANone
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Transparent
Opaque
3.5 Refractive Index
1.603-1.6901.460-1.570
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Biaxial/+
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Orthorhombic Dipyramidal H-M Symbol (2/m 2/m 2/m) Space Group: P nma
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
Not Available0.023-0.050
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Transparent
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Anthophyllite Vs Chrysocolla Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Anthophyllite and Chrysocolla Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Anthophyllite Vs Chrysocolla fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Anthophyllite is Brittle, Brittle, Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Conchoidal. Chrysocolla fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal.

Anthophyllite Vs Chrysocolla Luster

A primary knowledge about Anthophyllite vs Chrysocolla luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Anthophyllite exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster. Chrysocolla, on other hand, exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster.