×

Carnelian
Carnelian

Orthoclase
Orthoclase



ADD
Compare
X
Carnelian
X
Orthoclase

Carnelian Vs Orthoclase

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available
Russia
1.2 Color
Red
Colorless, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow, White, pink
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Taurus, Leo, Taurus, Leo, Taurus, Leo
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Sun
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Projective
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Isis, Bragi
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Protection, Healing, Courage
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.58-2.642.54-2.61
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Splintery, Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001)
Gems, Uneven
2.6 Cleavage
Absent
Has perfect cleavage on {001} and good cleavage on {010}. Cleavages intersect at 90°.
2.7 Mohs Hardness
6.5-76
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
SiO2
KAlSi 3O 8Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous, Pearly
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
colorless.
3.3 Dispersion
None0.01
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Translucent, Transparent to nearly opaque
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
3.5 Refractive Index
1.535-1.5391.518-1.536
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Trigonal
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
0.003-0.0090.0050-0.0060
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Translucent
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Carnelian Vs Orthoclase Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Carnelian and Orthoclase Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Carnelian Vs Orthoclase fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Carnelian is Conchoidal, Gemstones of the world (2001), Splintery, Uneven and UnevenWalter Schumann. Orthoclase fracture is Gems and Uneven.

Carnelian Vs Orthoclase Luster

A primary knowledge about Carnelian vs Orthoclase luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Carnelian exhibits Vitreous luster. Orthoclase, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.