Diopside

Phenakite

Diopside Vs Phenakite

Diopside

Phenakite

Add ⊕

1 Astrology

1.1 Origin

USA, Brazyl, Austria, Italy, Tanzania, Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka, Burma, Color: green, yellow-green, Not Available, Not Available, Not Available, Hardness: 5.5 6, Refractive index: 1.66 1.71, Density: 3.25 3.55, Chemical composition: CaMg(Si2O6), Crystal structure: monoclinic, Origins: USA, Brazyl, Austria, Italy, Tanzania, Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka

USA, Brazyl, Switzerland, Tanzania, Madagascar, Russia, Sri Lanka

1.2 Color

Yellow, Colorless, Brown, Blue, Brown, Colorless, Green, gray

Colorless, Yellow, pink, Red

1.3 Streak

White, White, Green

White

1.4 For which Rashi?

Not Available

1.5 Planet

Not Available

1.6 Element of Planets

Not Available

1.7 How to Wear?

1.7.1 Finger

Not Available

1.7.2 Ring Metal

Not Available

1.8 Energy

Not Available

1.9 Deities

Not Available

1.10 Not to wear with

Not Available

1.11 Powers

Not Available

1.12 Birthstone

1.12.1 Planetary

Not Available

1.12.2 Talisman

Not Available

2 Physical Properties

2.1 Tenacity

Brittle

2.2 Solubility

Not Available

2.3 Durability

Not Available

2.4 Specific Gravity

3.22-3.402.90-2.98

1 7.18

2.5 Fracture

Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Conchoidal

Conchoidal, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Brittle

2.6 Cleavage

Distinct/good on {110}

Distinct on {11 2 0}, imperfect on {10 1 1}

2.7 Mohs Hardness

5-67.5-8

2 10

2.8 Chemical Composition

CaMgSi₂O₆

Be 2SiO 4Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references

3 Optical Properties

3.1 Luster

Vitreous

3.2 Pleochroism

Not Available

Distinct: colorless orangy-yellowHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli

3.3 Dispersion

0.020.02

0.007 1

3.4 Transparency

Transparent, Translucent, Not Available, Transparent . Star Diopside is opaque .

Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references

3.5 Refractive Index

1.664-1.7301.650-1.695

1 3.25

3.6 Optic Character

Not Available

3.7 Crystal System

monoclinic

Trigonal

3.8 Birefringence

0.024-0.0300.016

0 0.296

3.9 Clarity

Transparent

TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda

4 Benefits

4.1 Physical

4.1.1 Neurological

Not Available

4.1.2 Cardiovascular

Not Available

4.1.3 Respiratory

Not Available

4.1.4 Reproductive

Not Available

4.1.5 Digestive

Not Available

4.2 Psychology

Not Available

4.3 Healing

Not Available

4.4 Qualities Associated

Not Available

Diopside Vs Phenakite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Diopside and Phenakite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Diopside Vs Phenakite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Diopside is Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references and UnevenWalter Schumann. Phenakite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalWalter Schumann and Gemstones of the world (2001).

Compare Yellow Gemstones

Diopside Vs Fayalite

Diopside Vs Ettringite

Diopside Vs Feldspar

Diopside Vs Phenakite Luster

A primary knowledge about Diopside vs Phenakite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Diopside exhibits Vitreous luster. Phenakite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.