×

Imperial Topaz
Imperial Topaz

Anthophyllite
Anthophyllite



ADD
Compare
X
Imperial Topaz
X
Anthophyllite

Imperial Topaz Vs Anthophyllite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Red
Brown, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish
1.3 Streak
Not Available
gray
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.49-3.572.9-3.5
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven
Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
Not Available
{110} Perfect, {???} Distinct, {???} Distinct
2.7 Mohs Hardness
85.5-6
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Not Available
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 2(Mg,Fe2+ ) 5Si 8O 22(OH) 2Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Not Available
Vitreous, Pearly
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
When Fe-rich
3.3 Dispersion
0.01NA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Transparent
Transparent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.609-1.6431.603-1.690
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Biaxial/+
3.7 Crystal System
Not Available
Orthorhombic Dipyramidal H-M Symbol (2/m 2/m 2/m) Space Group: P nma
3.8 Birefringence
Not AvailableNot Available
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Not Available
Transparent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Imperial Topaz Vs Anthophyllite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Imperial Topaz and Anthophyllite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Imperial Topaz Vs Anthophyllite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Imperial Topaz is Uneven. Anthophyllite fracture is Brittle, Brittle, Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Conchoidal.

Imperial Topaz Vs Anthophyllite Luster

A primary knowledge about Imperial Topaz vs Anthophyllite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Anthophyllite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.