×

Orthoclase
Orthoclase

Ruby
Ruby



ADD
Compare
X
Orthoclase
X
Ruby

Orthoclase Vs Ruby

Add ⊕
1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Russia
Burma, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, Madagascar, Tanzania, Kenya
1.2 Color
Colorless, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow, White, pink
Red, pink, Red
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Leo, Scorpio, Cancer, Sagittarius, Leo, Scorpio, Cancer, Sagittarius, Leo, Scorpio, Cancer, Sagittarius
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Mars
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Ring Finger
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Gold, Copper, Gold, Copper
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Projective
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Buddha, Krishna
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Ruby, Blue Sapphire, Diamond, Gomedh, Ruby, Blue Sapphire, Diamond, Gomedh
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Wealth, Joy
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Pisces
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.54-2.613.97-4.05
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Gems, Uneven
Conchoidal
2.6 Cleavage
Has perfect cleavage on {001} and good cleavage on {010}. Cleavages intersect at 90°.
No true cleavage
2.7 Mohs Hardness
69
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
KAlSi 3O 8Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
Al 2 O 3
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Pearly
Vitreous, Adamantine, Vitreous, Adamantine
3.2 Pleochroism
colorless.
Strong: purplish-red
3.3 Dispersion
0.010.02
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Transparent, Translucent, Transparent to opaque
3.5 Refractive Index
1.518-1.5361.762-1.778
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Trigonal
3.8 Birefringence
0.0050-0.00600.008
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Transparent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Orthoclase Vs Ruby Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Orthoclase and Ruby Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Orthoclase Vs Ruby fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Orthoclase is Gems and Uneven. Ruby fracture is Conchoidal.

Orthoclase Vs Ruby Luster

A primary knowledge about Orthoclase vs Ruby luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Orthoclase exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster. Ruby, on other hand, exhibits Adamantine, Adamantine, Vitreous and Vitreous luster.