×

Orthoclase
Orthoclase

Topaz
Topaz



ADD
Compare
X
Orthoclase
X
Topaz

Orthoclase Vs Topaz

Add ⊕
1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Russia
Brazil, Madagascar, Russia, USA, Mexico, Pakistan, brown, Yellow, Orange, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Russia, brown, Yellow, Orange, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Russia
1.2 Color
Colorless, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow, White, pink
Yellow, Blue, Green, Red, White, Colorless, Blue, Red, Green, Yellow, pink, Brown
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Sagittarius
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Sun
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Projective
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Ra
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Healing, Love, Money
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.54-2.613.49-3.57
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Gems, Uneven
Subconchoidal, Uneven, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
Has perfect cleavage on {001} and good cleavage on {010}. Cleavages intersect at 90°.
[001] Perfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
68
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
KAlSi 3O 8Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
Al2SiO4(F,OH)2
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Pearly
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
colorless.
Weak
3.3 Dispersion
0.010.01
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Transparent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.518-1.5361.606-1.644
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Orthorhombic
3.8 Birefringence
0.0050-0.00600.008-0.011
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Orthoclase Vs Topaz Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Orthoclase and Topaz Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Orthoclase Vs Topaz fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Orthoclase is Gems and Uneven. Topaz fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Subconchoidal and Uneven.

Orthoclase Vs Topaz Luster

A primary knowledge about Orthoclase vs Topaz luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Orthoclase exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster. Topaz, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.